Methods to Expand Medicaid Enrollment

States can expand the pool of women insured by Medicaid by streamlining the enrollment process.  Even if eligible, many people do not enroll, either because they do not know they are eligible or because they encounter barriers to enrollment even if their income meets the eligibility level.  Therefore, it is important for states to simplify enrollment procedures.  The Report Card focuses on three methods states can use to expand enrollment for certain populations.  First, states can adopt a policy that makes a pregnant woman “presumptively” eligible for Medicaid once she submits preliminary income information.1  Second, states can simplify enrollment for families by allowing parents to apply jointly with their children using a simplified mail-in application.  Third, states can cover more people by eliminating the “asset test.”2  The asset test counts parents’ ownership of certain assets when determining the family’s eligibility for Medicaid.  Eliminating this test serves multiple purposes, including easing the application process, streamlining and reducing administrative costs and increasing the pool of eligible people. 

 

1 42 U.S.C. § 1396r-1(states may provide for making ambulatory prenatal care available to a pregnant woman during a presumptive eligibility period).

 

2 Assets (or resources) refer to items of personal or real property.  State Medicaid programs determine resource standards that are then measured against the individual’s assets.  If these assets are less than the standard, the individual meets the asset test.  Assets that are countable are generally not homes, furniture or clothes.  Savings accounts can be counted, although the entire value of the account is not always included.  Cars can be counted, although this differs across states (i.e., some states do not count cars at all, some count only a second car, and others disregard a car up to a certain value).  Generally, asset limits are very low, ranging from $1,000 to $6,000 dollars. 42 U.S.C. § 1396u-1(b)(2)(c).

  • Asset Test for Parents

      Strength Of Policy 2007 Change From 2004
    ALABAMA Meets Policy Same
    ALASKA No/Harmful Policy Same
    ARIZONA Meets Policy Same
    ARKANSAS No/Harmful Policy Same
    CALIFORNIA No/Harmful Policy Same
    COLORADO No/Harmful Policy Same
    CONNECTICUT Meets Policy Same
    DELAWARE Meets Policy Same
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Meets Policy Same
    FLORIDA No/Harmful Policy Same
    GEORGIA No/Harmful Policy Same
    HAWAII No/Harmful Policy Same
    IDAHO No/Harmful Policy Same
    ILLINOIS Meets Policy Same
    INDIANA No/Harmful Policy Same
    IOWA No/Harmful Policy Same
    KANSAS Meets Policy Same
    KENTUCKY No/Harmful Policy Same
    LOUISIANA Meets Policy Same
    MAINE No/Harmful Policy Same
    MARYLAND No/Harmful Policy Same
    MASSACHUSETTS Meets Policy Same
    MICHIGAN No/Harmful Policy Same
    MINNESOTA No/Harmful Policy Same
    MISSISSIPPI Meets Policy Same
    MISSOURI Meets Policy Same
    MONTANA No/Harmful Policy Same
    NEBRASKA No/Harmful Policy Same
    NEVADA No/Harmful Policy Same
    NEW HAMPSHIRE No/Harmful Policy Same
    NEW JERSEY Meets Policy Same
    NEW MEXICO Meets Policy Same
    NEW YORK No/Harmful Policy Same
    NORTH CAROLINA No/Harmful Policy Same
    NORTH DAKOTA Meets Policy Same
    OHIO Meets Policy Same
    OKLAHOMA Meets Policy Same
    OREGON No/Harmful Policy Same
    PENNSYLVANIA Meets Policy Same
    RHODE ISLAND Meets Policy Same
    SOUTH CAROLINA No/Harmful Policy Worse
    SOUTH DAKOTA No/Harmful Policy Same
    TENNESSEE No/Harmful Policy Same
    TEXAS No/Harmful Policy Same
    UTAH No/Harmful Policy Same
    VERMONT No/Harmful Policy Same
    VIRGINIA Meets Policy Better
    WASHINGTON No/Harmful Policy Same
    WEST VIRGINIA No/Harmful Policy Same
    WISCONSIN Meets Policy Same
    WYOMING Meets Policy Same
     
    Meets PolicyMeets Policy 21  
    Limited PolicyLimited Policy 0  
    Weak PolicyWeak Policy 0  
    No/Harmful PolicyNo/Harmful Policy 30  
    Better Better 1  
    Worse Worse 1  
    Same Same 49  

    Has the state eliminated the asset test for parents, thereby facilitating the application process and increasing the pool of eligible people?

    States receive a "meets policy" if they do not count parents' ownership of assets when determining their eligibility for Medicaid. States receive a "harmful policy" if they apply an asset test to the application process.

    Data Source: Asset Test for Parents, 2006.

    The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, "Resuming the Path to Health Coverage for Children and Parents: A 50 State Update on Eligibility Rules, Enrollment and Renewal Procedures, and Cost-Sharing Practices in Medicaid and SCHIP in 2006," January 2007, available at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/7608a.cfm.