Clinical Trials
For patients with chronic, long-term, or terminal illnesses, access to clinical trials can be crucial in defining and treating life-threatening illnesses, especially when experimental approaches are the only treatment available. The Report Card examines whether states require managed care plans to pay for clinical trials.
Starting in 2014, health plans will be required to cover the cost of patient participation in clinical trials. "Grandfathered" plans--those that existed before the Affordable Care Act was passed--are exempt from this requirement, but plans will lose their grandfathered status if they significantly cut benefits, increase out-of-pocket spending, or change insurance carriers.
Does the state require private insurance plans to cover the costs of participating in clinical trials for adults?
States receive a "meets policy" if they require private insurance plans to pay the routine costs associated with clinical trials for adult patients. States receive a "weak policy" if they only require insurers to offer coverage of clinical trials as a benefit in health insurance plans, but have not required that it be a covered benefit in insurance plans. States receive a "no policy" if they do not mandate coverage for clinical trials.
| State | Strength of Policy | Change from 2007 |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | No Policy | Same |
| Alaska | No Policy | Same |
| Arizona | Meets Policy | Same |
| Arkansas | No Policy | Same |
| California | Meets Policy | Same |
| Colorado | Meets Policy | Better |
| Connecticut | Meets Policy | Same |
| Delaware | Meets Policy | Same |
| District of Columbia | Meets Policy | Better |
| Florida | No Policy | Same |
| Georgia 1 | No Policy | Same |
| Hawaii | No Policy | Same |
| Idaho | No Policy | Same |
| Illinois | No Policy | Same |
| Indiana | Meets Policy | Better |
| Iowa | No Policy | Same |
| Kansas | No Policy | Same |
| Kentucky | No Policy | Same |
| Louisiana | Meets Policy | Same |
| Maine | Meets Policy | Same |
| Maryland | Meets Policy | Same |
| Massachusetts | Meets Policy | Same |
| Michigan | No Policy | Same |
| Minnesota | No Policy | Same |
| Mississippi | No Policy | Same |
| Missouri | Meets Policy | Same |
| Montana | No Policy | Same |
| Nebraska | No Policy | Same |
| Nevada | Meets Policy | Same |
| New Hampshire | Meets Policy | Same |
| New Jersey | No Policy | Same |
| New Mexico | Meets Policy | Same |
| New York 2 | No Policy | Same |
| North Carolina | Meets Policy | Same |
| North Dakota | No Policy | Same |
| Ohio | Meets Policy | Better |
| Oklahoma | No Policy | Same |
| Oregon | Meets Policy | Better |
| Pennsylvania | No Policy | Same |
| Rhode Island | Meets Policy | Same |
| South Carolina | No Policy | Same |
| South Dakota | No Policy | Same |
| Tennessee | Meets Policy | Same |
| Texas | No Policy | Same |
| Utah | No Policy | Same |
| Vermont | Meets Policy | Same |
| Virginia | Meets Policy | Same |
| Washington | No Policy | Same |
| West Virginia | Meets Policy | Same |
| Wisconsin | Meets Policy | Same |
| Wyoming | Meets Policy | Better |
Data Sources: 1) National Conference of State Legislatures, "Clinical Trials: What are States Doing? August 2009 Update," available at http://www.ncsl.org/Default.aspx?TabId=14331, accessed September 8, 2010; 2) Susan S. Laudicina et al, State Legislative Healthcare and Insurance Issues: 2009 Survey of Plans, (Washington, D.C.: BlueCross BlueShield Association, December 2009).
Footnotes
1 Georgia was graded incorrectly in the 2007 Report Card. It should have received a "no policy" instead of a "meets policy." Since there is no change in the individual state law for this state, the comparison with 2007 is based on the underlying data, that is, there is no change from 2007.
2 New York was graded incorrectly in the 2007 Report Card. It should have received a "no policy" instead of a "meets policy," since coverage for participation in a clinical trials is only covered when a plan enrollee has gone through an appeal process and clinical trial participation is recommended by an external appeal agent. Since there is no change in the individual state law for this state, the comparison with 2007 is based on the underlying data, that is, there is no change from 2007.




