Genetic

States can pass genetic nondiscrimination laws that reinforce and expand upon federal law to ensure that people do not face genetic discrimination in health insurance or employment. While the federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) prohibits certain forms of discrimination based on genetic information by group health plans, health insurers, and employers based on genetic information, gaps remain.1 For example, most of the law’s employment protections do not apply to employers with fewer than 15 employees, and the law does not prohibit health insurers or health plan administrators from obtaining and using genetic test results in making health insurance payment determinations.2

Starting in 2014, health insurance plans are prohibited from discriminating against individuals on the basis of health status.  The Affordable Care Act explicitly lists “genetic information” among the health-status related factors which cannot be used to establish rules for eligibility or coverage.

Does state law prohibit employment and health insurance discrimination based on genetic information?

States receive a "meets policy" if they prohibit discrimination based on genetic information in both health insurance and employment. States receive a "limited policy" if they prohibit such discrimination in either health insurance or employment. States with no genetic anti-discrimination laws receive a "no policy."

State Strength of Policy Change from 2007
Alabama 3 No Policy Same
Alaska Limited Policy Same
Arizona Meets Policy Same
Arkansas Meets Policy Same
California Meets Policy Same
Colorado Limited Policy Same
Connecticut Meets Policy Same
Delaware Meets Policy Same
District of Columbia Meets Policy Better
Florida 4 Limited Policy Same
Georgia Limited Policy Same
Hawaii Meets Policy Same
Idaho Meets Policy Same
Illinois Meets Policy Same
Indiana Limited Policy Same
Iowa Meets Policy Same
Kansas Meets Policy Same
Kentucky Limited Policy Same
Louisiana Meets Policy Same
Maine Meets Policy Same
Maryland Meets Policy Same
Massachusetts Meets Policy Same
Michigan Meets Policy Same
Minnesota Meets Policy Same
Mississippi No Policy Same
Missouri Meets Policy Same
Montana Limited Policy Same
Nebraska Meets Policy Same
Nevada Meets Policy Same
New Hampshire Meets Policy Same
New Jersey Meets Policy Same
New Mexico Meets Policy Same
New York Meets Policy Same
North Carolina Meets Policy Same
North Dakota Limited Policy Better
Ohio Limited Policy Same
Oklahoma Meets Policy Same
Oregon Meets Policy Same
Pennsylvania Limited Policy Better
Rhode Island Meets Policy Same
South Carolina Limited Policy Same
South Dakota Meets Policy Same
Tennessee Limited Policy Same
Texas Meets Policy Same
Utah Meets Policy Same
Vermont Meets Policy Same
Virginia Meets Policy Same
Washington Limited Policy Same
West Virginia Limited Policy Same
Wisconsin Meets Policy Same
Wyoming Limited Policy Same

Policy Indicator Counts
Meets Policy: 
34
Limited Policy: 
15
Weak Policy: 
0
No/Harmful Policy: 
2
Better: 
3
Same: 
48
Worse: 
0

Data Source: National Conference of State Legislatures, "Genetics and Health Insurance State Anti-Discrimination Laws," updated January 2008, available at http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=14374, accessed September 10, 2010; National Conference of State Legislatures, "Genetic Employment Laws," updated January 2008, available at http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/Health/GeneticEmploymentLaws/tabid/14..., accessed September 10, 2010; National Institutes of Health, "National Human Genome Research Institute Database," available at  http://www.genome.gov/PolicyEthics/LegDatabase/pubsearch.cfm, accessed September 10, 2010

Footnotes

1 The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, P.L. 110-233, 122 Stat. 881 (2008).

2 National Human Genome Research Institute, “The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008: Information for Researchers and Health Care Professionals,” (Rockville: Department of Health and Human Services, National Human Genome Research Institute, April 6, 2009), available at http://www.genome.gov/Pages/PolicyEthics/GeneticDiscrimination/GINAInfoD..., accessed September 24, 2010.

3 Alabama only prohibits insurers from considering a predisposition for cancer in risk selection or risk classification, and from using genetic information to deny coverage to applicants with sickle cell anemia. Alabama was graded incorrectly in the 2007 Report Card.  It should have received a "no policy" instead of a "limited policy." Since there is no change in the individual state law for this state, the comparison with 2007 is based on the underlying data, that is, there is no change from 2007.

4 Florida only prohibits the use of genetic information for denying employment to persons with the sickle-cell trait, or requiring screening or testing for the sickle-cell trait as a condition for employment.

  • print