Presumptive Eligibility for Pregnant Women

States can adopt a policy that makes a pregnant woman “presumptively” eligible for Medicaid once she submits preliminary income information.1

States have new opportunities to use presumptive eligibility to provide health services through Medicaid. States that adopt the Medicaid family planning expansion can take advantage of presumptive eligibility for women who need family planning services (effective immediately). Starting in 2014, states can choose to allow qualified hospital to use presumptive eligibility to provide services to all potential Medicaid enrollees.

Does the state provide presumptive Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women?

States receive a "meets policy" if they allow a pregnant woman to receive Medicaid coverage while her application is being approved.  States that do not consider a pregnant woman to be presumptively eligible for Medicaid receive a "no policy."

State Strength of Policy Change from 2007
Alabama No Policy Same
Alaska No Policy Same
Arizona No Policy Same
Arkansas Meets Policy Same
California Meets Policy Same
Colorado Meets Policy Same
Connecticut 2 Meets Policy Same
Delaware Meets Policy Same
District of Columbia Meets Policy Same
Florida Meets Policy Same
Georgia Meets Policy Same
Hawaii No Policy Same
Idaho Meets Policy Same
Illinois Meets Policy Same
Indiana Meets Policy Better
Iowa Meets Policy Same
Kansas No Policy Same
Kentucky Meets Policy Same
Louisiana 3 Meets Policy Same
Maine Meets Policy Same
Maryland 4 Meets Policy Better
Massachusetts Meets Policy Same
Michigan Meets Policy Same
Minnesota No Policy Same
Mississippi No Policy Same
Missouri Meets Policy Same
Montana Meets Policy Same
Nebraska Meets Policy Same
Nevada No Policy Same
New Hampshire Meets Policy Same
New Jersey Meets Policy Same
New Mexico Meets Policy Same
New York Meets Policy Same
North Carolina Meets Policy Same
North Dakota No Policy Same
Ohio 5 Meets Policy Same
Oklahoma Meets Policy Same
Oregon No Policy Same
Pennsylvania Meets Policy Same
Rhode Island No Policy Same
South Carolina 6 Meets Policy Same
South Dakota No Policy Same
Tennessee Meets Policy Same
Texas Meets Policy Same
Utah Meets Policy Same
Vermont No Policy Same
Virginia No Policy Same
Washington No Policy Same
West Virginia No Policy Same
Wisconsin Meets Policy Same
Wyoming Meets Policy Same

Policy Indicator Counts
Meets Policy: 
35
Limited Policy: 
0
Weak Policy: 
0
No/Harmful Policy: 
16
Better: 
2
Same: 
49
Worse: 
0

Data Source: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "Has Presumptive Eligibility Under Medicaid for Pregnant Women," December 2009, available at http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparetable.jsp?ind=225&cat=4, accessed September 7, 2010.

Footnotes

1 States may provide for making ambulatory prenatal care available to a pregnant woman during a presumptive eligibility period. 42 U.S.C. § 1396r-1 (2009).

2 Connecticut has an alternative, presumptive eligibility-like process in place. The 2010 health report card gives full credit to Connecticut for this alternative process; the 2007 health report card did not give the state credit though the process was in place at that time. This represents a change in the way Connecticut is graded and not an actual change in policy, thus no change is reported from 2007 to 2010.

3 Louisiana has an alternative, presumptive eligibility-like process in place.

4 Maryland has an alternative, presumptive eligibility-like process in place.

5 Ohio has an alternative, presumptive eligibility-like process in place. The 2010 health report card gives full credit to Ohio for this alternative process; the 2007 health report card did not give the state credit though the process was in place at that time. This represents a change in the way Ohio is graded and not an actual change in policy, thus no change is reported from 2007 to 2010.

6 South Carolina has an alternative, presumptive eligibility-like process in place. The 2010 health report card gives full credit to South Carolina for this alternative process; the 2007 health report card did not give the state credit though the process was in place at that time. This represents a change in the way South Carolina is graded and not an actual change in policy, thus no change is reported from 2007 to 2010.

  • print